Re: [ports-gcc-8] meta/gnome fixes and report

2019-04-28 Thread Charlene Wendling
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 17:35:48 +0200 Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > > Ping, with an updated diff. > > We're in the middle of a major GNOME update. Could this wait until > g2k19? Maybe some of these won't be needed anymore. Sure

Re: [ports-gcc-8] meta/gnome fixes and report

2019-04-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > Ping, with an updated diff. We're in the middle of a major GNOME update. Could this wait until g2k19? Maybe some of these won't be needed anymore. > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:18:31 +0200 > Charlene Wendling wrote: > > > H

Re: [ports-gcc-8] meta/gnome fixes and report

2019-04-28 Thread Charlene Wendling
Ping, with an updated diff. On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:18:31 +0200 Charlene Wendling wrote: > Hi ports, > > (obviously for post unlock) > > After having built meta/{xfce,lxqt,mate} flawlessly on my powerbook, > it was time to see how far meta/gnome would go with ports-gcc-8. > > It requires

[ports-gcc-8] meta/gnome fixes and report

2019-04-14 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi ports, (obviously for post unlock) After having built meta/{xfce,lxqt,mate} flawlessly on my powerbook, it was time to see how far meta/gnome would go with ports-gcc-8. It requires only COMPILER fixes. In a future GNOME update, maybe we should set a global COMPILER in gnome.port.mk, like qt5