On 16/03/2021 18:18, Renaud Allard wrote:
On 16/03/2021 17:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Exim has a big monolothic process design and lots of optional features
many of which pull in third party libraries which are complex themselves
(and *also* will have to deal with the same pledge restricti
On 2021/03/27 14:37, Renaud Allard wrote:
> >
> > So, here is a diff without pledge but with the SIOCGIFCONF call removed
> > as this should really be tested.
>
> I haven't had anyone complaining or telling OK about this patch. I haven't
> had any crash or bug myself with it. So, maybe nobody tes
On 16/03/2021 17:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Exim has a big monolothic process design and lots of optional features
many of which pull in third party libraries which are complex themselves
(and *also* will have to deal with the same pledge restrictions which
again may vary in what functions th
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > In fact, I scanned the code looking for calls, so this should be ready for
> > general use. I could have restricted it way more for my own use only.
> > Though, I agree, this only protects from a very limited subset like route,
> > settime, pf, audio, video.
>
> Even
On 2021/03/16 18:18, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
> On 16/03/2021 17:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > Exim has a big monolothic process design and lots of optional features
> > many of which pull in third party libraries which are complex themselves
> > (and *also* will have to deal with the same p
