On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Christian Weisgerber
wrote:
> David Coppa wrote:
>
>> Tested. It works w/o problems.
>> Opinions/OKs ?
>
> This finally gets the cmake build to honor MAKE_JOBS, so
> DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel will actually make sense. The old build
> used the setting only for the f
David Coppa wrote:
> Tested. It works w/o problems.
> Opinions/OKs ?
This finally gets the cmake build to honor MAKE_JOBS, so
DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel will actually make sense. The old build
used the setting only for the first bootstrap stage and the rest
of the build ran one job at a time.
mak
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:57:04PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/06/28 06:03, David Coppa wrote:
> >>
> >> Tested. It works w/o problems.
> >>
> >> Opinions/OKs ?
> >
> > Makes sense, but I wonder if it might be better to move USE_
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/06/28 06:03, David Coppa wrote:
>>
>> Tested. It works w/o problems.
>>
>> Opinions/OKs ?
>
> Makes sense, but I wonder if it might be better to move USE_NINJA to
> bsd.port.mk to avoid duplication..
>
Already requested to Marc ;)
On 2013/06/28 06:03, David Coppa wrote:
>
> Tested. It works w/o problems.
>
> Opinions/OKs ?
Makes sense, but I wonder if it might be better to move USE_NINJA to
bsd.port.mk to avoid duplication..
Tested. It works w/o problems.
Opinions/OKs ?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/cmake/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.84 Makefile
--- Makefile25 Jun 2013 07:16:46 - 1.84
+++ Makefil
