$ firefox &
[2] 24794
$ top
$ ps
  PID TT  STAT       TIME COMMAND
16819 p1  Z       0:00.00 (firefox)
61237 p1  Z       0:00.00 (firefox)
32024 p1  Ssp     0:00.01 ksh
 8876 p1  I       0:00.19 firefox
24794 p1  S       0:04.79 firefox
  373 p1  R+p/0   0:00.00 ps
$ kill -9 16819
$ ps
  PID TT  STAT       TIME COMMAND
61237 p1  Z       0:00.00 (firefox)
32024 p1  Ssp     0:00.01 ksh
24794 p1  I       0:04.79 firefox
28606 p1  R+p/1   0:00.00 ps
[1] - Done                 firefox
$ kill -9 61237
$ ps
  PID TT  STAT       TIME COMMAND
61237 p1  Z       0:00.00 (firefox)
32024 p1  Ssp     0:00.01 ksh
24794 p1  I       0:04.79 firefox
91733 p1  R+p/1   0:00.00 ps
$ kill -9 61237
ksh: kill: 61237: No such process
$ ps
  PID TT  STAT       TIME COMMAND
32024 p1  Ssp     0:00.01 ksh
24794 p1  D       0:06.13 firefox
17741 p1  S       0:00.00 dbus-launch
--autolaunch=d3a4785d28139dbad41abb225a91d3af --binary-syntax
--close-stderr
46916 p1  R+p/0   0:00.00 ps

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Z Ero <zerotetrat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 6.2 AMD64, firefox 58.
>
> If firefox crashes (which happens rarely) sometimes I find it does not
> start back up again. It seems to become a zombie or something. It
> starts then goes directly to suspend. Why? Any work around known?
>
> I suspect it has something to do with dbus waiting for something or
> firefox waiting for something from dbus.
>
> I have found killing my multiple attempts at starting firefox
> eventually produces a dialogue window saying "firefox is already
> running but not responding." Well... Then when I kill the process that
> started the dialogue window it firefox finally starts.
>
> But this behaviour is strange and the solution would not be intuitive
> to many less technical users (e.g. if one was using OpenBSD + Firefox
> as a platform for a thinclient / web browser + think client based
> application). Maybe firefox eventually starts on its own (after 5
> minutes) but I have never had the patience to wait around to try
> that...in any case that would be unacceptable for a general user.
>
> Does any one else experience this?
>
> Is there any solution / work around?
>
> Thanks.

Reply via email to