On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 02:04:50PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:45:59PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:57:42PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > >
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:45:59PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:57:42PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > According to rc.subr(8) rc_check should return exit code 0 or 1 but
> >
> >
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:57:42PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to rc.subr(8) rc_check should return exit code 0 or 1 but
>
> Not really no. The "check" action should return 0|1.
>
Ah right, different
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:57:42PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to rc.subr(8) rc_check should return exit code 0 or 1 but
Not really no. The "check" action should return 0|1.
> for a running postgresql instance pg_ctl(1) returns 3. In the manpage
> under status it says: If th
Hi,
According to rc.subr(8) rc_check should return exit code 0 or 1 but
for a running postgresql instance pg_ctl(1) returns 3. In the manpage
under status it says: If the server is not running, the process returns
an exit status of 3.
Below a patch to fix that - can someone please take care of it
