On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:32:36PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:04:14PM +0200, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > +@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void handleSignal(int signum) {
> > + break;
> > + #endif
> > + case SIGSEGV:
> > +-abort();
> > ++exit(0);
> > +
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 01:34:20PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
>
> this seems a fluxbox bug which is not OpenBSD specific, you should
> rather report it on fluxbox bug tracker if any.
I can't reproduce it on Linux.
On the other hand I have not seen anything in the code that was OpenBSD
specific
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 02:06:49PM +0200, Rubén Llorente wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 01:34:20PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> >
> > this seems a fluxbox bug which is not OpenBSD specific, you should
> > rather report it on fluxbox bug tracker if any.
>
> I can't reproduce it on Linux.
>
>
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:02:01 - (UTC)
Rubén Llorente :
> Hi there,
>
> This is a bug report against x11/fluxbox
>
> I have noticed that fluxbox has a tendency to segfault and dump a
> core in my $HOME when the X server is manually turned off.
>
> If you use xenodm to launch fluxbox and then
Hi there,
This is a bug report against x11/fluxbox
I have noticed that fluxbox has a tendency to segfault and dump a
core in my $HOME when the X server is manually turned off.
If you use xenodm to launch fluxbox and then turn it off (eihter
by issuing # rcctl stop xenodm or by hitting Ctrl + Alt
On Wed 20/10/2021 15:32, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:04:14PM +0200, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > +@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void handleSignal(int signum) {
> > + break;
> > + #endif
> > + case SIGSEGV:
> > +-abort();
> > ++exit(0);
> > + break;
> > +
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:04:14PM +0200, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> +@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void handleSignal(int signum) {
> + break;
> + #endif
> + case SIGSEGV:
> +-abort();
> ++exit(0);
> + break;
> + case SIGALRM:
> + // last resort for shutting down f
On Wed 20/10/2021 00:02, Rubén Llorente wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This is a bug report against x11/fluxbox
>
> I have noticed that fluxbox has a tendency to segfault and dump a
> core in my $HOME when the X server is manually turned off.
>
> If you use xenodm to launch fluxbox and then turn it off
