On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I sent an email with the corrected version of my racket port
attached. I wonder if my mail got lost as I did not get any response. If
it is not of enough good quality, then response would be appreciated.
I already
Thank you! I do know you do it on your spare time. I just got worried
when I got very fast response on the version still having something to
be fixed, but nothing on the version that i corrected.
I will wait patiently now :)
On 03/22/12 10:16, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:23:53AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
Thank you! I do know you do it on your spare time. I just got
worried when I got very fast response on the version still having
something to be fixed, but nothing on the version that i corrected.
I will wait patiently now :)
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I sent an email with the corrected version of my racket port
attached. I wonder if my mail got lost as I did not get any response. If
it is not of enough good quality, then response would be appreciated.
Thank you for your patience. We are all beginners at some point. If I can
disturb with one thing more:
Earlier Antoine wrote this:
* I don't think CONFIGURE_ARGS is needed here, --prefix is the default.
Now Antoine wrote:
All CONFIGURE_ARGS are missing.
I got confused and I hope somebody can
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:29:03PM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
Thank you for your patience. We are all beginners at some point. If I can
disturb with one thing more:
Earlier Antoine wrote this:
* I don't think CONFIGURE_ARGS is needed here, --prefix is the default.
Now Antoine wrote:
