Chris Bennett writes:
> I realize that this "sounds" tempting and "seems" reasonable.
short version: you like pain and don't see why others should have a
way to avoid it.
//art
On 2009 Jun 01 (Mon) at 19:00:20 -0500 (-0500), Chris Bennett wrote:
> I think forcing people to struggle with OpenBSD a little is a good
> thing. Hey, I chose OpenBSD very quickly after playing with a few
> versions of linux when I decided to abandon windows.
You can still download the source
* Chris Bennett (ch...@bennettconstruction.biz) wrote:
>
>
> Ian Darwin wrote:
>> Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:28:34PM -0600, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>>
(what about a GNOME meta-package?)
>>>
>>> If meta-packages will get separate cetegory (subdir) under
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I realize that this "sounds" tempting and "seems" reasonable. When I first
> started using OpenBSD a few years ago, I found the process of having to
> individually download each KDE package , OOH SOO irritating!! But I now deeply
> appreciate having contro
Ian Darwin wrote:
Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:28:34PM -0600, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
(what about a GNOME meta-package?)
If meta-packages will get separate cetegory (subdir) under ${PORTSDIR}
I support the idea, otherwise I'm against.
I would like to hear othe
Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:28:34PM -0600, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
(what about a GNOME meta-package?)
If meta-packages will get separate cetegory (subdir) under ${PORTSDIR}
I support the idea, otherwise I'm against.
I would like to hear others opinion.
Work
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:28:34PM -0600, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> (what about a GNOME meta-package?)
If meta-packages will get separate cetegory (subdir) under ${PORTSDIR}
I support the idea, otherwise I'm against.
I would like to hear others opinion.
--
best regards
q#
