On 5/28/19 8:11 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:22:16PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
Last thing this needs is to remove the hardcoded -O flags from
pcc-libs/libpcc/Makefile.in and pcc-libs/libsoftfloat/Makefile.in. Then it's
ok.
~Brian
Yay!
This is ok now, if someone
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:22:16PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Last thing this needs is to remove the hardcoded -O flags from
> pcc-libs/libpcc/Makefile.in and pcc-libs/libsoftfloat/Makefile.in. Then it's
> ok.
>
> ~Brian
>
Yay!
Index: Makefile
===
On 5/26/19 2:40 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 07:52:18PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
The configure scripts are outdated. *shrug*
You should keep to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=amd64 i386 with the comment explaining why
(which you also removed).
Too bad support for other architectures
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 07:52:18PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> The configure scripts are outdated. *shrug*
> You should keep to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=amd64 i386 with the comment explaining why
> (which you also removed).
>
Too bad support for other architectures is deprecated, it's just no hope
it'll
On 5/25/19 2:01 PM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 01:12:06PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 5/25/19 11:58 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
Index: Makefile.inc
===
RCS file: Makefile.inc
diff -N Makefile.inc
--- /dev/null
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 01:12:06PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 5/25/19 11:58 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> > Index: Makefile.inc
> > ===
> > RCS file: Makefile.inc
> > diff -N Makefile.inc
> > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00
On 5/25/19 11:58 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:58:48PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 5/23/19 8:35 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
In do-test target replace "./cc/cc/pcc" with "./cc/cc/cc".
I don't understand this test target at all to be perfectly honest. All it
does it ma
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:58:48PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
>
>
> On 5/23/19 8:35 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> > In do-test target replace "./cc/cc/pcc" with "./cc/cc/cc".
>
> I don't understand this test target at all to be perfectly honest. All it
> does it make sure the driver program can s
On 5/23/19 8:35 AM, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
In do-test target replace "./cc/cc/pcc" with "./cc/cc/cc".
I don't understand this test target at all to be perfectly honest. All
it does it make sure the driver program can spit out a single line of
text. It doesn't initiate the preprocessor or the
In do-test target replace "./cc/cc/pcc" with "./cc/cc/cc".
Also p++ is not a C++ compiler, it can't even compile hello world in C++
:(
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 07:41:19PM +0300, Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> Thomas Frohwein said I should use 1.1.0.20190521 to avoid EPOCH in the
> future, but I'd like to
Thomas Frohwein said I should use 1.1.0.20190521 to avoid EPOCH in the
future, but I'd like to get more comments on versioning.
I still wonder what tweaks can be made to plist?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/pcc/Makefi
11 matches
Mail list logo