On 2010/07/23 23:42, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
Stuart Henderson [2010-07-23, 22:15:37]:
On 2010/07/23 15:40, Todd T. Fries wrote:
Since there are two `alternate' system loggers, and rsyslog sports a
feature syslog-ng does not, notibly RELP (Reliable Event Logging
Protocol),
is there
Penned by Stuart Henderson on 20100724 11:48.43, we have:
| On 2010/07/23 23:42, Steven Mestdagh wrote:
| Stuart Henderson [2010-07-23, 22:15:37]:
| On 2010/07/23 15:40, Todd T. Fries wrote:
|Since there are two `alternate' system loggers, and rsyslog sports a
|feature syslog-ng does
Since there are two `alternate' system loggers, and rsyslog sports a
feature syslog-ng does not, notibly RELP (Reliable Event Logging Protocol),
is there any reason we can't have both in the ports tree?
This was submitted a couple years back, no discussion, and obviously no
commit.
Any
On 2010/07/23 15:40, Todd T. Fries wrote:
Since there are two `alternate' system loggers, and rsyslog sports a
feature syslog-ng does not, notibly RELP (Reliable Event Logging Protocol),
is there any reason we can't have both in the ports tree?
This was submitted a couple years back, no
Stuart Henderson [2010-07-23, 22:15:37]:
On 2010/07/23 15:40, Todd T. Fries wrote:
Since there are two `alternate' system loggers, and rsyslog sports a
feature syslog-ng does not, notibly RELP (Reliable Event Logging Protocol),
is there any reason we can't have both in the ports tree?
