On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:59:57PM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 10:43 am, you wrote:
> > I have added a -devel subpackage to the port (attached), I included the
> > IDL files in the PLIST, but I am uncertain as to the absolute correct
> > place to put them, for now
Fascinating... so mozilla gets bloated to the point where no-one
wants it, so they split it into firefox and thunderbird so that
people don't get the bloat, and now people complain that stuff
is not *integrated* so they put the bloat back together and label
it `seamonkey'.
Oh yes, and if we use th
On Saturday 02 December 2006 2:46 pm, James Wright wrote:
> Nikolay Sturm wrote:
> > * James Wright [2006-12-02]:
> >
> >> latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version
> >> 1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird),
> >>
> >
> > What is the p
Nikolay Sturm wrote:
* James Wright [2006-12-02]:
latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version
1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird),
What is the point of this port? Is there anything genuine in seamonkey
that is not in firefox and f
* James Wright [2006-12-02]:
> latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version
> 1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird),
What is the point of this port? Is there anything genuine in seamonkey
that is not in firefox and friends?
Nikolay
latest -stable mozilla seamonkey (the next generation suite) version
1.0.6 (equivalent to the 1.5.0.8 releases of firefox/thunderbird),
-current required, switched over to use devel/nspr, should build/run
wherever firefox/thunderbird does, basically the same set of patches,
same version of geck
