On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > It's systrace not capable of allocating mem for the args to
> > > rename(2). The args are replaced by their canonical path (which is
> > > absolute and thus quite long) and systrace uses the stackgap of 512
> > > bytes for that. Obviously two path n
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> I'm working on arj/unarj ports for use with clamav, and I'm struggling
> to regain all the things I've forgotten about C. ;-) While searching
> the archives, I stumbled across this tread from a couple weeks ago but
> I'm still wondering
--- "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 02:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > Judging from the amount of noise this post made
> > > I'm guessing that either a) no one cared or b) I
> > > didn't supply enough relevant info for anyone to
> > > bother to chime in with
On Friday 22 December 2006 02:54, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Judging from the amount of noise this post made
> > I'm guessing that either a) no one cared or b) I
> > didn't supply enough relevant info for anyone to
> > bother to chime in with a hint or a pointer.
> >
> > I don't know much about systr
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> The problem reduces too the rename(2) system call.
>
> create a deep path:
>
> $ mkdir $(jot -s '' -b d 200)
> $ cd d*
> $ mkdir $(jot -s '' -b d 100)
> $ cd d*
> $ touch foo
> $ systrace -At mv foo bar
> : $ [this is an incomplete error message]
>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, patrick ~ wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> It is very late here, but thanks for your hint
> about NAME_MAX.
>
> I've been looking at the systrace sources trying
> to figure out how it works and if there would be
> any obvious path len issues that would pop-out.
> I couldn't find any.
Hi Otto,
It is very late here, but thanks for your hint
about NAME_MAX.
I've been looking at the systrace sources trying
to figure out how it works and if there would be
any obvious path len issues that would pop-out.
I couldn't find any.
I took your suggestion to try and find a simple(er)
test-
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, patrick ~ wrote:
> Judging from the amount of noise this post made
> I'm guessing that either a) no one cared or b) I
> didn't supply enough relevant info for anyone to
> bother to chime in with a hint or a pointer.
>
> I don't know much about systrace to be able to
> make
Judging from the amount of noise this post made
I'm guessing that either a) no one cared or b) I
didn't supply enough relevant info for anyone to
bother to chime in with a hint or a pointer.
I don't know much about systrace to be able to
make any realistic progress with this, but some
hints would
