The sysutils/xbatt problem was a reminder that 64-bit related bugs
are still all over the ports tree. fgsch@ has prodded me again and
after wavering over this for years, I think it is time to declare
a ZERO-TOLERANCE POLICY ON VISIBLE 64-BIT BUGS and embark on a
concerted campaign to eradicate the
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:21:55PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> The sysutils/xbatt problem was a reminder that 64-bit related bugs
> are still all over the ports tree. fgsch@ has prodded me again and
> after wavering over this for years, I think it is time to declare
> a ZERO-TOLERANCE POL
On 2008/06/28 16:21, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> By "visible" I mean that when you build a port on a 64-bit arch,
> you get one of these compiler warnings:
It might warrant drawing extra attention to "on a 64-bit arch".
These warnings do not show up if you build the port on 32-bit.
People submi
