I have personally always liked gnome, but the version in the ports tree
is so old and broken that using it is essentially pointless.
I was wondering what window manager was recommended for use with OpenBSD
3.9? i.e, one that is reasonably current, and not broken.
Thanks!
-={C}=-
On Thursday 25 May 2006 22:56, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> I have personally always liked gnome, but the version in the ports tree
> is so old and broken that using it is essentially pointless.
>
> I was wondering what window manager was recommended for use with OpenBSD
> 3.9? i.e, one that is rea
Christopher Nelson dixit:
>I was wondering what window manager was recommended
Definitively IceWM, maybe evilwm if you prefer something small.
//mirabile
--
> emacs als auch vi zum Kotzen finde (joe rules) und pine für den einzig
> bedienbaren textmode-mailclient halte (und ich hab sie alle aus
ion!
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:00:13AM +0200, viq wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 22:56, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> > I have personally always liked gnome, but the version in the ports tree
> > is so old and broken that using it is essentially pointless.
> >
> > I was wondering what window mana
On Thu, 25 May 2006 23:07:40 + (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Nelson dixit:
>
> >I was wondering what window manager was recommended
>
> Definitively IceWM, maybe evilwm if you prefer something small.
IceWM seems pretty stable, but I would also look a
* Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060525 19:27]:
> ion!
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:00:13AM +0200, viq wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 May 2006 22:56, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> > > I have personally always liked gnome, but the version in the ports tree
> > > is so old and broken that using it
On 5/25/06, Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060525 19:27]:
> ion!
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:00:13AM +0200, viq wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 May 2006 22:56, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> > > I have personally always liked gnome, but the version in the p
> On Thu, 25 May 2006 23:07:40 + (UTC)
> Thorsten Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Christopher Nelson dixit:
>>
>> >I was wondering what window manager was recommended
>>
>> Definitively IceWM, maybe evilwm if you prefer something small.
>
> IceWM seems pretty stable, but I would a
Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
I personally are using IceWM under 3.8 -stable, and it work fine, it is a
lite & fast window manager.
Another vote for icewm. Used it heavily under 3.8 & 3.9-beta, but
haven't tried it under 3.9 yet.
-ME
--
Support OpenBSD: http://www.openbsd.org/orders.ht
viq wrote:
On Thursday 25 May 2006 22:56, Christopher Nelson wrote:
I have personally always liked gnome, but the version in the ports tree
is so old and broken that using it is essentially pointless.
I was wondering what window manager was recommended for use with OpenBSD
3.9? i.e, one that i
Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll second ion! Why did I ever waste screen space with other window
managers.?.?.
I agree. And I really like the start of the Ion Manifesto:
(http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/)
So-called "modern desktop environments" are totally unusable
I think
On Fri, 26 May 2006 06:12:15 +0200 (CEST), "Johan Zandin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll second ion! Why did I ever waste screen space with other window
> > managers.?.?.
>
> I agree. And I really like the start of the Ion Manifesto:
> (http://modeemi.
On 5/26/06, Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ion is great. I've had recommendations to try wmii as well. But once I
got adjusted to using ion, I've had no reason or desire to change.
One more recommendation for wmii!
http://wmii.de
bernhard
> One more recommendation for wmii!
> http://wmii.de
>
> bernhard
wmii is not in the Ports, is it?
-simon
pgpbdR8zCsiYY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 5/26/06, Simon Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more recommendation for wmii!
> http://wmii.de
>
> bernhard
wmii is not in the Ports, is it?
x11/wmi, just installed and quite like it ;)
-simon
--
viq
>
> Christopher Nelson dixit:
>
> >I was wondering what window manager was recommended
>
> Definitively IceWM, maybe evilwm if you prefer something small.
It appears that the version of icewm in the packages installation is
over a year old. Is that correct?
-={C}=-
Christopher Nelson wrote:
[...]
I was wondering what window manager was recommended for use with OpenBSD
3.9? i.e, one that is reasonably current, and not broken.
Am I the only one that is quite satisfied with fvwm? While not as
keyboard-only-friendly as ion et al by default, it is quite dece
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:22:30PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Christopher Nelson wrote:
> [...]
> >I was wondering what window manager was recommended for use with OpenBSD
> >3.9? i.e, one that is reasonably current, and not broken.
>
> Am I the only one that is quite satisfied with fvwm? Whi
I don't know...Ratpoison looked to me as a bad hack in comparison to
Ion. Why won't it work with the Gimp? It seems they borrowed the
philosophy, but don't have they same programming skills...I don't
know...Looks that way.
One problem I did find with Ion was that Gnome didn't behave too well,
so
nobody is defending blackbox, so let me be the one :)
has it's fair share of problems but it's good for the eyes,
light on resources, inobtrusive, with a long history and
tradittion and started an avalanche of clones :)
-f
--
if i die, i forgive you, if i recover, we shall see.
20 matches
Mail list logo
