On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> > builds.
> >
> > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?
>
> It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it
> instead:
>
> - SIGILL on amd64,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:07:01AM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500
> > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>
> > > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> > > builds.
>
> > >
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500
> Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> > builds.
> > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?
> It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500
Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64
> builds.
>
> ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64?
It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it
instead:
- SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on
