Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/02/24 10:48, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> > I don't know what's going on here, but I'll note that rthread_atfork.c
> > hasn't
> > changed since before 5.5.
>
> What changed is p11-kit's atfork handler. Reverting this commit
> fixes AGI in asterisk. (URL here, their
On 2015/02/24 10:48, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> I don't know what's going on here, but I'll note that rthread_atfork.c hasn't
> changed since before 5.5.
What changed is p11-kit's atfork handler. Reverting this commit
fixes AGI in asterisk. (URL here, their diff inline below).
http://cgit.freedeskto
Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> ...
> > 12995 asterisk RET fork 0
> > 12995 asterisk CALL
> > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x8005003)
> > 12995 asterisk RET sigprocmask ~0x10100
> > 12995 asterisk CALL getthrid()
> > 12995 asterisk RET getthrid 101299
On 2015/02/24 02:59, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Yes that gets rid of the "unable to execute" from the system("pwd") call.
> > (unfortunately the AGI script can't be fixed that way as it needs to not
> > block the parent).
>
> IMO, fixing
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/02/23 16:15, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
>> ...
>> > 12995 asterisk RET fork 0
>> > 12995 asterisk CALL
>> > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x8005003)
>> > 12995 asterisk RET sigprocmask
On 2015/02/23 16:15, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> ...
> > 12995 asterisk RET fork 0
> > 12995 asterisk CALL
> > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x8005003)
> > 12995 asterisk RET sigprocmask ~0x10100
> > 12995 asterisk CALL getthrid()
> > 12995 asterisk
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
...
> 12995 asterisk RET fork 0
> 12995 asterisk CALL
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x8005003)
> 12995 asterisk RET sigprocmask ~0x10100
> 12995 asterisk CALL getthrid()
> 12995 asterisk RET getthrid 1012995/0xf7503
> 12995 asterisk PSIG SIGSE
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Alexey Suslikov
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Alexey Suslikov
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Philip Guenther
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
I modified chunk at
>>> ...
to be
if (res >
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Alexey Suslikov
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Philip Guenther
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
>>> I modified chunk at
>> ...
>>> to be
>>>
>>> if (res > -1) {
>>>ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "WIFCONTINUED = %d\n", WIFCONTINUED(
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Philip Guenther
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
>> I modified chunk at
> ...
>> to be
>>
>> if (res > -1) {
>>ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "WIFCONTINUED = %d\n", WIFCONTINUED(status));
>>ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "WIFEXITED = %d\n", WIFEXITED(sta
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> I modified chunk at
...
> to be
>
> if (res > -1) {
>ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "WIFCONTINUED = %d\n", WIFCONTINUED(status));
>ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "WIFEXITED = %d\n", WIFEXITED(status));
>ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "WIFSIGNALED = %d\n", WIFSIGNALED(s
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/13/res/res_agi.c?view=markup#l1828
> http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/13/main/app.c?view=markup#l2904
>
> I've given it a bit of a poke with added logging in Asterisk but
> no
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Alexey Suslikov
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> I can replicate this on my system (I'm running Asterisk 13 on
>> -current at the moment), including with a simpler script that just
>> touches a file in /tmp and doesn't deal wit
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I can replicate this on my system (I'm running Asterisk 13 on
> -current at the moment), including with a simpler script that just
> touches a file in /tmp and doesn't deal with input at all; script
> doesn't appear to run at all.
Try 5.
I can replicate this on my system (I'm running Asterisk 13 on
-current at the moment), including with a simpler script that just
touches a file in /tmp and doesn't deal with input at all; script
doesn't appear to run at all.
The asterisk code involved in this hasn't been modified in 4
years or so.
Hello.
Found while migrating to 5.7 snap.
Two systems:
* 5.6 (RELEASE) running Asterisk 11.11
* 5.7 (Feb 22 snap) running Asterisk 11.16 (also tried with 11.11, 11.7, 11.5.1)
Both systems have same Asterisk setup.
extensions.conf:
[from-trunk]
exten => _XX,1,Wait(1)
exten => _XX
16 matches
Mail list logo