On 2019/09/18 13:24, Gleydson Soares wrote:
>
>
> > On 18 Sep 2019, at 12:26, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> On 2019/09/18 05:48, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> >>
> >>
> On 18 Sep 2019, at 04:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2019/09/18 02:15, wen heping wrote:
> Hi,
> On 18 Sep 2019, at 12:26, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2019/09/18 05:48, Gleydson Soares wrote:
>>
>>
On 18 Sep 2019, at 04:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2019/09/18 02:15, wen heping wrote:
Hi, ports@:
Here is a patch for net/p5-Net-BGP:
i)
On 2019/09/18 05:48, Gleydson Soares wrote:
>
>
> > On 18 Sep 2019, at 04:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> On 2019/09/18 02:15, wen heping wrote:
> >> Hi, ports@:
> >>
> >> Here is a patch for net/p5-Net-BGP:
> >> i) Update to 0.17
> >> ii) Add TEST_POD=yes
> >
> > I've
> On 18 Sep 2019, at 04:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2019/09/18 02:15, wen heping wrote:
>> Hi, ports@:
>>
>> Here is a patch for net/p5-Net-BGP:
>> i) Update to 0.17
>> ii) Add TEST_POD=yes
>
> I've been wondering for a while... what's the point in using TEST_POD
> in
On 2019/09/18 02:15, wen heping wrote:
> Hi, ports@:
>
>Here is a patch for net/p5-Net-BGP:
>i) Update to 0.17
>ii) Add TEST_POD=yes
I've been wondering for a while... what's the point in using TEST_POD
in ports? Isn't that more of an "author test" kind of thing?