Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2018

2019-01-11 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:38:15PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 04:44:25PM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:41:41AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > > Tested typesetting few docs too, all seems well. > > > > Ping, and and additional diff. > > > >

Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2018

2019-01-10 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 04:44:25PM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:41:41AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > Tested typesetting few docs too, all seems well. > > Ping, and and additional diff. > > In addition to the already posted gzipped diff to update TeX Live (which >

Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2018

2018-12-04 Thread Edd Barrett
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:17:33PM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > I've tested it on only amd64 at this point, but all ports BUILD_DEPEND > or LIB_DEPENDing on any of TeX Live have been build tested. And I've also build tested tex live on sparc64 (I had to kludge mupdf to use the ports-tree version

Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2018

2018-11-17 Thread Jon Bernard
* Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a first go at TeX Live 2018. > > I've tested it on only amd64 at this point, but all ports BUILD_DEPEND > or LIB_DEPENDing on any of TeX Live have been build tested. > > Please test your documents! I tried several documents including an IEEEtran draft and

Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2018

2018-11-13 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:24:42PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > If it is, can we make it a bit more verbose, because I'm not sure what > > it means :) > > As things stand, texmf has very specific version number requirements, so > if texlive_base is bumped, texmf/Makefile also needs

Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2018

2018-11-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/11/12 23:17, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a first go at TeX Live 2018. > > I've tested it on only amd64 at this point, but all ports BUILD_DEPEND > or LIB_DEPENDing on any of TeX Live have been build tested. > > Please test your documents! > > Stuart, is this still needed? >