Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-12-06 Thread Brad Smith
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping cherokee as had been mentioned on the list in the past. It would be great if someone else can test this as well to confirm that. An

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-12-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:44:34PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping cherokee as had been mentioned on the list in the past. It would be

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-12-06 Thread Brad Smith
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:44:34PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-12-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:18:01AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:44:34PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-12-06 Thread Brad Smith
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:26:55AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:18:01AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:44:34PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-12-06 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:30:29AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:26:55AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:18:01AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:44:34PM

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-12-05 Thread Brad Smith
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping cherokee as had been mentioned on the list in the past. It would

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-10-14 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping cherokee as had been mentioned on the list in the past. It would be great if someone else can test this as well to confirm that. The

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-10-10 Thread Fernando Quintero
Hi all, Are there news about it? Thanks. On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.orgwrote: On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping cherokee

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-10-10 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:57:47PM -0500, Fernando Quintero wrote: Hi all, Are there news about it? Yeah sorrry I got caught up by other stuffs... I will definitely look at it. If you don't hear from me by the end of the week, ping and I'll put it on top of my todo. Thanks, and

UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-09-25 Thread Brad Smith
Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping cherokee as had been mentioned on the list in the past. It would be great if someone else can test this as well to confirm that. Index: Makefile

Re: UPDATE: cherokee 1.2.101

2012-09-25 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:32:43AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is the update for cherokee 1.2.101 again. I cannot seem to reproduce any issues with stopping cherokee as had been mentioned on the list in the past. It would be great if someone else can test this as well to confirm that. I'll