Bump, now that the ports embargo is over.
Stuart, do you prefer if I use the more common idiom in pexp and drop
the eval? The comment from /src/etc/rc.d/rc.subr makes sense IMO, but
this will be the only port using that idiom out of the 138 that define
pexp.
rc.subr,v 1.134 fragment for convenien
On 2020/05/16 20:08, Lucas wrote:
> Bump, now that the ports embargo is over.
>
> Stuart, do you prefer if I use the more common idiom in pexp and drop
> the eval? The comment from /src/etc/rc.d/rc.subr makes sense IMO, but
> this will be the only port using that idiom out of the 138 that define
>
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I would just use the common idiom used by other ports. If there is a
> problem with that then I guess they'll all need fixing in a sweep.
Okey, updated patch in here. It still runs OK in my server.
-Lucas
Index: Makefile
===
Lucas wrote:
> Okey, updated patch in here. It still runs OK in my server.
The bump never ends.
-Lucas
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/net/prosody/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -p -r1.56 Makefile
--- Ma
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:22:27PM +, Lucas wrote:
> Lucas wrote:
> > Okey, updated patch in here. It still runs OK in my server.
>
> The bump never ends.
Sorry - commited!