On 2009/01/21 16:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> updated to the this week's new 1.2 version - 1.3 does some nice things
> but is rather heavy on dependencies. msf (maintainer) doesn't necessarily
> agree with staying with 1.2.x but doesn't mind too much either way.
>
> any ok's?
p.s. the old versio
updated to the this week's new 1.2 version - 1.3 does some nice things
but is rather heavy on dependencies. msf (maintainer) doesn't necessarily
agree with staying with 1.2.x but doesn't mind too much either way.
any ok's?
Index: Makefile
==
On 2008/12/12 08:01, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2008/12/12 01:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
>>> i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
>>>
>>
>> ..or sooner.
>>
>> Really lightly tested
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/12/12 01:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
..or sooner.
Really lightly tested in standalone use on amd64 only so far.
Definitely needs much test
On 2008/12/12 01:46, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
>
> i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
>
..or sooner.
Really lightly tested in standalone use on amd64 only so far.
Definitely needs much testing in other plac
On 2008/12/12 09:31, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
i'll probably look at it in a day or two.
Is anyone work for RRDtool 1.3.4 ?
2008/12/11 LÉVAI Dániel :
> Hi!
>
> This updates rrdtool-1.2.23 to 1.2.28. Use patch -E, one new patch was
> added, and one removed.
> It's been running for a while on i386 here without problems.
>
> Please test/comment.
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> LEVAI Daniel
> PGP key
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/12/11 10:44, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
PKGNAME-main= ${DISTNAME}p0
this can go completely
-PKGNAME-python= py-rrd-${VERSION}p1
+PKGNAME-python= py-rrd-${VERSION}p0
and remove p0 here
SHARED_LIBS+= rrd 3.0
SHARED_LIBS+= rrd_th 3.0
diff doesn't show any AP
On 2008/12/11 10:44, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> This updates rrdtool-1.2.23 to 1.2.28. Use patch -E, one new patch was
> added, and one removed.
> It's been running for a while on i386 here without problems.
>
> Please test/comment.
> PKGNAME-main=${DISTNAME}p0
this can go completely
> -PKG
Hi!
This updates rrdtool-1.2.23 to 1.2.28. Use patch -E, one new patch was
added, and one removed.
It's been running for a while on i386 here without problems.
Please test/comment.
Daniel
--
LEVAI Daniel
PGP key ID = 0x4AC0A4B1
Key fingerprint = D037 03B9 C12D D338 4412 2D83 1373 917A 4AC0
On 2007/06/20 23:03, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> This diff resolves the RUN_DEPENDS issues in the previous version
unfortunately, this has repeatable segfaults on sparc64, even with -O0.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01836.html
looks like it may be the same problem (in 1.2.18
On 2007/06/20 23:03, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> This diff resolves the RUN_DEPENDS issues in the previous version
works for me on amd64 (after uninstalling the previous version
to get it built).
basically ok with symon/syweb and smokeping in ports (after updating
the copy in the chroot and ma
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:30:46PM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> by popular request here's an update to the latest version of net/rrdtool.
>
> I've broken all of the binding stuff up into subpackages and enabled perl,
> python and ruby bindings. I can enable tcl if anyone really needs it.
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
not even the MAINTAINER.
FYI:
That's because the maintainer is completely unresponsive, at least I
didn't get any response when I tried to contact him regarding rrdtool
back in October/November.
---
Lars Hansson
Hi Alex,
> Does that mean I can expect to see it in 4.1?
No, it has not been committed yet, so it won't be in 4.1-release.
Holger Mauermann submitted updates on Jan 25, 29 and 30,
implementing ideas from Lars Hansson. Nobody else commented,
not even the MAINTAINER. Peter Valchev announced ports
TECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint: Update net/rrdtool!
alex writes:
Looking back in older posts, Holger Mauermann has submitted
patches so that a newer version of rrdtool will build. Can
someone please explain why the port hasnt been updated yet?
Because
Hi Guys,
Looking back in older posts, Holger Mauermann has submitted patches so that a
newer version of rrdtool
will build. Can someone please explain why the port hasnt been updated yet?
Alex
Holger Mauermann wrote:
> Here is an updated diff that also builds python, ruby and tcl bindings
> as subpackages. Please test.
Seems to work fine but at least the python binding should depend on the
rrdtool package. I don't know if it's the same for the other bindings.
---
Lars Hansson
Holger Mauermann wrote:
> Attached diff updates rrdtool from 1.0.49 to 1.2.18.
>
> Several month ago I already sent an update for rrdtool to ports@, but it
> is still not included in the ports tree... Anything wrong with it?
>
> Please test and comment.
It would be nice if we could have a -pytho
Attached diff updates rrdtool from 1.0.49 to 1.2.18.
Several month ago I already sent an update for rrdtool to ports@, but it
is still not included in the ports tree... Anything wrong with it?
Please test and comment.
Holger
Index: Makefile
==
20 matches
Mail list logo
