Re: UPDATE: py-jinja2

2014-09-05 Thread frantisek holop
ping? -f frantisek holop, 03 Sep 2014 17:32: > > please test and commit. > as far as i can say, the patch is not necessary > anymore. > > -f > -- > time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all its students. > Index: Makefile > ==

UPDATE: py-jinja2

2014-09-03 Thread frantisek holop
please test and commit. as far as i can say, the patch is not necessary anymore. -f -- time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all its students. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/py-jinja2/Makefile,v retrieving r

Re: UPDATE: py-jinja2

2014-05-25 Thread Robert Peichaer
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 01:14:47PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > ping? > this is also a security update... > > -f Commited, thx. > hmm, on Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:08:04PM +0200, frantisek holop said that > > a straightforward update. > > please test and commit. > > > > -f > > -- > > no se

Re: UPDATE: py-jinja2

2014-05-25 Thread Robert Peichaer
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 01:14:47PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > ping? > this is also a security update... > > -f Hi, I don't use it but it built fine, the testsuite yields no errors, the port looks ok and portcheck is happy too. So, fwiw, OK @rpe and if nobody objects, I'll commit the update

Re: UPDATE: py-jinja2

2014-05-25 Thread frantisek holop
ping? this is also a security update... -f hmm, on Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:08:04PM +0200, frantisek holop said that > a straightforward update. > please test and commit. > > -f > -- > no sense being pessimistic. it wouldn't work anyway. > Index: Makefile > ===

UPDATE: py-jinja2

2014-05-20 Thread frantisek holop
a straightforward update. please test and commit. -f -- no sense being pessimistic. it wouldn't work anyway. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/py-jinja2/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.17 Makefile --- M