Am 28.11.23 um 14:46 schrieb Lucas Gabriel Vuotto: > Hi Martin, ports, > > Here is an update to ntfy 2.8.0. v2 features a lot of things, mostly > oriented to running it like a PaaS (signup and tiers), and access tokens > for users and webpush, also useful in a selfhosted small-scale > deployment. It also support some new integrations (Twilio for > text-to-speech calls, Stripe for payments, ...). > > On the ports side, there has been some modifications: > > - Added /var/ntfy to PLIST, as it's a handy place for DBs > - Small patch for server.yml to hint the operator to user /var/ntfy > (will send this one upstream if the previous item is merged in the > port) > - The default, commented-out server.yml is now installed in /etc/ntfy > - Dropped "--listen-port :8080" from ntfy.rc, favouring defining such an > option in the config file (can be discussed--this will make it run at > port 80 if there isn't a config file and the default flags are being > used, which in turns mean that ntfy won't start.) > - I spent 2h wondering why would I get a HTTP 200 OK blank page when I > tried to visit the web. Not 4xx, no error. Only a blank page. It > became clear what the issue was when I read the port Makefile: we > don't ship it. I tried to take a stab at building it, but the build > relies on esbuild, which currently SIGILLs at startup in my machine. > idk if it's because syscall removal is rolled out already (currently > running OpenBSD 7.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #1467: Fri Nov 24 22:39:10 > MST 2023), IBT (I tried it only on my laptop, which does have the > hardware), or the fact that the only dependency for it is > "golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20220715151400-c0bba94af5f8" (seems old and > I recall issues with Go and x/sys). ftr, I only tried with the built > binary and haven't tried building esbuild myself yet. Also, I'm quite > unsure whether it makes any sense to try to port esbuild to current > OpenBSD, as I believe that won't fix it being pulled by NPM > nevertheless.</rant> > Instead of generating empty app.html and docs/index.html, write a > small text in each explaining that those aren't packaged in OpenBSD > and provide a link ot upstream versions, which is at least something. > (The docs require mkdocs, a Python package not currently ported. I'll > take a look at either porting it or building the docs page locally > with a venv, but at a later time.) > > Lucas
Hello Lucas, thank you for the diff, looks good! Maybe we should mention the requirement for esbuild and mkdocs in the Makefile comment. -m
