On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 08:50:26PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> How did you get these results?
>
> $ export FLAVOR=python3
> $ make test
> ...
> Ran 296 tests in 4.156s
>
> FAILED (failures=1, errors=4)
> Test failed: failures=1>
> ...
>
> See my full
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 06:00:40PM +0200, clematis wrote:
> Yes. It's a little bit noisy. A few depreciation since Python 3.0
>
> platform openbsd6 -- Python 2.7.16, pytest-4.4.0, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.11.0
> 30 failed, 153 passed
> platform openbsd6 -- Python 3.7.4, pytest-4.4.0, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 06:00:40PM +0200, clematis wrote:
> Tested with one, productivity/khal, built, installed and ran OK.
Thanks.
> Note for those who might have manually installed via pip some of these
> deps (as root) I would recommand to pip uninstall them before so they are
> all properly
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 01:25:37PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Did you test the existing users of this port?
Tested with one, productivity/khal, built, installed and ran OK.
Note for those who might have manually installed via pip some of these
deps (as root) I would recommand to pip uninstall
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:31:20PM +0200, clematis wrote:
> Here's a quick update for devel/py-urwid from 1.3.1 to 2.0.1
> Build and run ok on amd64 (as dep of upcoming net/toot update).
Thanks for looking into this.
Did you test the existing users of this port?
Did you run the regress suite (for
Hi Team,
Here's a quick update for devel/py-urwid from 1.3.1 to 2.0.1
Build and run ok on amd64 (as dep of upcoming net/toot update).
Comments? OK?
Thanks,
--
clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b59)
? diff-devel_py-urwid
Index: Makefile
===
RCS
