On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 10:52:51PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>
> > Am 07.07.2024 um 21:39 schrieb Theo Buehler :
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 12:33:38PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> >>> Am 07.07.24 um 11:13 schrieb Theo Buehler:
> >>> Thanks. I see lots of changes in exported sym
> Am 07.07.2024 um 21:39 schrieb Theo Buehler :
>
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 12:33:38PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>>> Am 07.07.24 um 11:13 schrieb Theo Buehler:
>>> Thanks. I see lots of changes in exported symbols that should usually
>>> result in a major bump for libobjfw and libobjfwrt
On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 12:33:38PM +0200, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 07.07.24 um 11:13 schrieb Theo Buehler:
> > Thanks. I see lots of changes in exported symbols that should usually
> > result in a major bump for libobjfw and libobjfwrt.
>
> Thanks for checking!
>
> > Is there some reason th
Am 07.07.24 um 11:13 schrieb Theo Buehler:
Thanks. I see lots of changes in exported symbols that should usually
result in a major bump for libobjfw and libobjfwrt.
Thanks for checking!
Is there some reason these bumps were left out?
Yes, these were private symbols that were accidentally vi
Thanks. I see lots of changes in exported symbols that should usually
result in a major bump for libobjfw and libobjfwrt. Is there some reason
these bumps were left out?
/usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.1 -->
/usr/ports/pobj/objfw-1.1.5/fake-amd64//usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.1
Dynamic export changes
Patch attached.
--
JonathanIndex: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 Makefile
--- Makefile 22 Apr 2024 18:02:31 - 1.9
+++ Makefile 6 Jul 2024 22:26:51 -
@@ -1,6 +
