> math/octave hits the same as py-qscintilla btw.
fallout from this is:
cad/openscad
math/octave
editors/py-qscintilla,python3
On 2022/08/16 22:28, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> > Le Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:16:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > > I hit this on a test build I'm doing on i386. It has updated py-setuptools
> > > but I don't think that will
Le Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> Le Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:16:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > I hit this on a test build I'm doing on i386. It has updated py-setuptools
> > but I don't think that will affect this (I can run a clean one to make sure
>
Le Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:16:58PM +0100, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> I hit this on a test build I'm doing on i386. It has updated py-setuptools
> but I don't think that will affect this (I can run a clean one to make sure
> when the machines are free)
>
> Errors are like this:
>
> ld: error:
I hit this on a test build I'm doing on i386. It has updated py-setuptools
but I don't think that will affect this (I can run a clean one to make sure
when the machines are free)
Errors are like this:
ld: error: /usr/local/lib/libqscintilla2_qt5.so.1.0: undefined reference to
Le Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 08:44:31AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> Here is an update diff to update:
>
> - x11/py-qt5
> - x11/py-qtawesome
> - x11/py-qtpy
> - x11/py-sip-qt5
> - editors/qscintilla
> - editors/py-qscintilla
> - devel/py-qt-builder
> - devel/py-sip
> - www/py-qtwebengine
>
>
On 7/26/2022 10:08 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Le Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 01:57:00PM +, Brian Callahan a écrit :
>> On 7/26/2022 9:43 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
>>> Le Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Caspar Schutijser a écrit :
I build-tested this and also did some runtime testing of
Le Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 01:57:00PM +, Brian Callahan a écrit :
> On 7/26/2022 9:43 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Le Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Caspar Schutijser a écrit :
> >> I build-tested this and also did some runtime testing of Calibre and
> >> that seems to work fine. So in
On 7/26/2022 9:43 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Le Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Caspar Schutijser a écrit :
>> I build-tested this and also did some runtime testing of Calibre and
>> that seems to work fine. So in that sense it's OK. But the veusz
>> problem is still there, right? I looked
Le Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Caspar Schutijser a écrit :
> I build-tested this and also did some runtime testing of Calibre and
> that seems to work fine. So in that sense it's OK. But the veusz
> problem is still there, right? I looked around in some other ports
> collections but
I build-tested this and also did some runtime testing of Calibre and
that seems to work fine. So in that sense it's OK. But the veusz
problem is still there, right? I looked around in some other ports
collections but I've not been able to find a patch we can borrow. So
I guess someone actually has
Annoying summer ping...
On Thu Jul 07, 2022 at 08:44:31AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Here is an update diff to update:
>
> - x11/py-qt5
> - x11/py-qtawesome
> - x11/py-qtpy
> - x11/py-sip-qt5
> - editors/qscintilla
> - editors/py-qscintilla
> - devel/py-qt-builder
> - devel/py-sip
> -
Here is an update diff to update:
- x11/py-qt5
- x11/py-qtawesome
- x11/py-qtpy
- x11/py-sip-qt5
- editors/qscintilla
- editors/py-qscintilla
- devel/py-qt-builder
- devel/py-sip
- www/py-qtwebengine
veusz need to be fixed before we can discuss to update this but I think
it makes sense to share
13 matches
Mail list logo
