On Sep 04 13:30:26, pas...@stumpf.co wrote:
> Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
It built and installed fine on my MacMini (current/macppc),
even with /etc/malloc.conf -> CFGPRSU
What would be a
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:41:45 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > Here's
> a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and >
> sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment. > > Go
> ahead and
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
>
> Go ahead and play with it.
ICE on powerpc:
cp-demangle.c: In function 'd_append_num':
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:42:25PM +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Dongsheng Song <
>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:42:25PM +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Dongsheng Song
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Your patch block llvm 3.8.1, I'm not care about gcc
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Dongsheng Song
> wrote:
> >
> > Your patch block llvm 3.8.1, I'm not care about gcc 4.9.4, but llvm 3.8.1
> > depends gcc 4.
>
> Pascal already imported LLVM 3.8.1
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>
> Your patch block llvm 3.8.1, I'm not care about gcc 4.9.4, but llvm 3.8.1
> depends gcc 4.
Pascal already imported LLVM 3.8.1 into the base so I guess the plan
is to use it at least on some architectures so
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:08:37 +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> > >
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:08:37 +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>
> > Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> > sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
> >
> > Go ahead and
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
>
> Go ahead and play with it.
>
Thanks for your great work !
But when I install gcc
On September 4, 2016 4:40:23 PM GMT+01:00, Marc Espie wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
>> Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386
>and
>> sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
>>
>> Go
> > I'd vote that you put it in, unlinked, and we can play in tree.
>
> Yes please!
>
>
I would LOVE to see it!
--
Thanks,
Bryan
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 05:40:23PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> > sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
> >
> > Go ahead and play with
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
> sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
>
> Go ahead and play with it.
I'd vote that you put it in, unlinked, and we can play in tree.
Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and
sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment.
Go ahead and play with it.
6.tgz
Description: 6.tgz
15 matches
Mail list logo