On 08/11/2009, at 8:33 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
as I posted afterwards, you need to 'make plist'. but use the diff
giovanni@ posted instead (which fixes this, and fixes build if you
have
the standalone tdb port installed, though it does still install a
header
which conflicts with that).
as I posted afterwards, you need to 'make plist'. but use the diff
giovanni@ posted instead (which fixes this, and fixes build if you have
the standalone tdb port installed, though it does still install a header
which conflicts with that).
On 2009/11/07 11:47, Anathae E. Townsend wrote:
> While t
While trying to build this using -current, using Stuart's patch I get the
following errors at the end of the process.
===> Building package for samba-3.4.3-ads
Create /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/samba-3.4.3-ads.tgz
Switching to /usr/ports/net/samba/pkg/PFRAG.shared-main
Error in package:
/usr/p
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
- build fails if tdb is installed (which hampers my testing
as the machine I'd run it on has fdm installed)
Now it builds with tdb too:
-CONFIGURE_ENV =CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
+CONFIGURE_ENV =CPPFLAGS+="-I${LOCALBASE}/i
Stuart Henderson wrote:
- build fails if tdb is installed (which hampers my testing
as the machine I'd run it on has fdm installed)
Now it builds with tdb too:
-CONFIGURE_ENV =CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
+CONFIGURE_ENV =CPPFLAGS+="-I${LOCALBASE}/include"
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:51:34AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> I doubt (and no need to resort on licence bashing ..).. debian (as an example)
> has a strict policy on that, looking in debian-devel or debian-legal ml
> archives
> could help. And it seems each kde component has specific licences :
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:21:12PM +1100, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>
> On 24/10/2009, at 9:32 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> >On 2009/10/16 10:06, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> >
> >>-SHARED_LIBS= smbclient 1.0 \
> >>+SHARED_LIBS = smbclient 1.0 \
> >
> >has anyone checked if
On 24/10/2009, at 9:32 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009/10/16 10:06, Ian McWilliam wrote:
-SHARED_LIBS= smbclient 1.0 \
+SHARED_LIBS = smbclient 1.0 \
has anyone checked if this needs a bump?
# GPLv2+
samba 3.2 and later are GPLv3+
from a quick look ov
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:32:04PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
| On 2009/10/16 10:06, Ian McWilliam wrote:
|
| > -SHARED_LIBS= smbclient 1.0 \
| > +SHARED_LIBS = smbclient 1.0 \
|
| has anyone checked if this needs a bump?
|
| > # GPLv2+
|
| samba 3.2 and late
On 2009/10/16 10:06, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> -SHARED_LIBS= smbclient 1.0 \
> +SHARED_LIBS = smbclient 1.0 \
has anyone checked if this needs a bump?
> # GPLv2+
samba 3.2 and later are GPLv3+
from a quick look over the packages which depend on libsmbclient,
gvfs/v
Hi,
I have tested this on amd64 current, worked fine, ads FLAVOR.
I have also tested on 4.6 i386 stable, worked fine for me using ads FLAVOR, as
before for samba 3.4.1, just updated package restarted and was running, samba
3.4.1 had been running since end of September.
The patch was applied to t
Rene Maroufi wrote:
Hi,
I tested both patches (wip1 and wip2) for samba 3.4.2 on an i386 OpenBSD
4.6 Stable machine, but both patches failed. Patch rejectes the
Makefile.
Is this patch only for current?
Regards
Rene
Yes the patch will only apply to a current net/samba port. Once you have
a
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:32:50AM +0200, Rene Maroufi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested both patches (wip1 and wip2) for samba 3.4.2 on an i386 OpenBSD
> 4.6 Stable machine, but both patches failed. Patch rejectes the
> Makefile.
>
> Is this patch only for current?
As everything sent here, yes .. unles
Hi,
I tested both patches (wip1 and wip2) for samba 3.4.2 on an i386 OpenBSD
4.6 Stable machine, but both patches failed. Patch rejectes the
Makefile.
Is this patch only for current?
Regards
Rene
--
René Maroufi
i...@maroufi.net
Attached is an updated WIP for samba-3.4.x. Please use patch -E when
applying the patch to avoid aggravation.
As usual comment, flames accepted.
Ian McWilliam
samba-3.4.2-wip1.diff
Description: Binary data
15 matches
Mail list logo