Re: _internal-manpages-check

2018-07-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Marc, Marc Espie wrote on Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 02:58:06PM +0200: > manpages-check was mostly mine back when I was in charge of makewhatis > Guess you have your own method instead :) Not really - i must admit i rarely check how makewhatis(8) gets along with ports manual pages at all, and i hea

Re: _internal-manpages-check

2018-07-29 Thread Marc Espie
> +++ ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk 29 Jul 2018 11:58:45 - > @@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ _internal-fetch-all: > .if (!empty(IGNORE${SUBPACKAGE}) || defined(_EXTRA_IGNORE)) && > !defined(NO_IGNORE) > _internal-all _internal-build _internal-check

Re: _internal-manpages-check

2018-07-29 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 02:03:36PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > That's even finer with me. > > I just noticed there is magic to redirect FOO to _internal-FOO, > so the public target "manpages-check" will have to go, too. > But given that it has been badly broken for years and nobody > complained,

Re: _internal-manpages-check

2018-07-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
rnal-fetch-all: .if (!empty(IGNORE${SUBPACKAGE}) || defined(_EXTRA_IGNORE)) && !defined(NO_IGNORE) _internal-all _internal-build _internal-checksum _internal-configure \ _internal-deinstall _internal-extract _internal-fake _internal-fetch \ - _internal-install _internal-

Re: _internal-manpages-check

2018-07-29 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 01:07:50PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi, > > i just found this patch in my tree. It should have been committed > years ago, it seems it was just forgotten. > > Alternatively, the target _internal-manpages-check could simply > be deleted. It

_internal-manpages-check

2018-07-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, i just found this patch in my tree. It should have been committed years ago, it seems it was just forgotten. Alternatively, the target _internal-manpages-check could simply be deleted. It is marked as internal, undocumented, and appears to be unused. If we want to keep it, here is a