Re: adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-06 Thread Ben Calvert
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:06:49 +0100 Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:54:58AM -0800, Ben Calvert wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 23:43:47 +0100 > > Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just en

Re: adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-06 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:54:58AM -0800, Ben Calvert wrote: > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 23:43:47 +0100 > Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just enable perl by > > default instead of creating a FLAVOR? > > > > How broadly are you will

Re: adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-06 Thread Ben Calvert
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 23:43:47 +0100 Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just enable perl by > default instead of creating a FLAVOR? > How broadly are you willing to extend this policy? for example, we have a -perl flavor for vim, which mean

Re: adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-06 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:43:13PM -0500, Adam Montague wrote: > Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just enable perl by > > default instead of creating a FLAVOR? > > There is no FLAVOR, the subpackage you mean? I wasn't sure if it should >

Re: adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-06 Thread janus
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:12:54AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote: > * Adam Montague wrote: > > Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just enable perl by > > > default instead of creating a FLAVOR? > > > > There is no FLAVOR, the subpackage you

Re: adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-05 Thread Marc Balmer
* Adam Montague wrote: > Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just enable perl by > > default instead of creating a FLAVOR? > > There is no FLAVOR, the subpackage you mean? I wasn't sure if it should > be in a subpackage (and if so, if there

Re: adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-05 Thread Adam Montague
Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just enable perl by > default instead of creating a FLAVOR? There is no FLAVOR, the subpackage you mean? I wasn't sure if it should be in a subpackage (and if so, if there should be a no_perl FLAVOR), or if i

adding perl to fastcgi

2006-11-05 Thread Marc Balmer
oh, and as we have perl in base, why don't you just enable perl by default instead of creating a FLAVOR?