On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:28:57 -0600
Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's say a port has to start a daemon to work. To have that happen at
> startup I would
> assume that means an rc.local phrase ... Is it approved practice to have
> a port edit rc.local?
> Or is there a safer and saner p
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Mike Erdely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:28:57PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
>> Let's say a port has to start a daemon to work. To have that happen at
>> startup I would
>> assume that means an rc.local phrase ... Is it approved practice to
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:28:57PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
> Let's say a port has to start a daemon to work. To have that happen at
> startup I would
> assume that means an rc.local phrase ... Is it approved practice to have
> a port edit rc.local?
> Or is there a safer and saner practice for
Let's say a port has to start a daemon to work. To have that happen at
startup I would
assume that means an rc.local phrase ... Is it approved practice to have
a port edit rc.local?
Or is there a safer and saner practice for this sort of thing?
--
Jack J. Woehr# "Self-delusion is
ht
