Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/03/29 00:56, Nigel Taylor wrote: > This one > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/13133/focus=13153 > > Says fixed in autoconf 2.68 to work with older pkg-config. Ah perfect, we can just take the patch then. > I looked at devel/metaauto, I can't get to pkg-confi

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-28 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 03/28/11 19:08, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/03/10 21:22, Nigel Taylor wrote: >>> "translit(`+,-12345', `+--1-5', `<;>a-c-a') >>> >>> This fails to give the correct reasult on OpenBSD a-c-a expected to be >>> equivalent to abcba, -a on the end is treated as -a." Back to back ranges >>> not

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-28 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/03/10 21:22, Nigel Taylor wrote: > > "translit(`+,-12345', `+--1-5', `<;>a-c-a') > > > > This fails to give the correct reasult on OpenBSD a-c-a expected to be > > equivalent to abcba, -a on the end is treated as -a." Back to back ranges > > not > > implemented yet. > > > > I think the i

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-17 Thread Marc Espie
Sorry for the lack of information from my part. I've duly noted your work. I just need to spend a few hours looking really hard at the standards, the code, checking what other compliant m4 say about translit, and then incorporate your patch. I did know it was a problem with translit(), but I had a

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-15 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 03/10/11 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: > good find. > > after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is > specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_ > apply it non-recursively. > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/m4.html > http://ww

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 03/10/11 20:38, Nigel Taylor wrote: > On 03/10/11 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> good find. >> >> after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is >> specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_ >> apply it non-recursively. >> >> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlin

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 03/10/11 16:28, Stuart Henderson wrote: > good find. > > after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is > specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_ > apply it non-recursively. > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/m4.html > http://ww

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
good find. after reading posix 2008 on this it isn't clear to me what is specified, but GNU m4 is clear in the documentation that _they_ apply it non-recursively. http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/m4.html http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/manual/html_node/Translit.html so im

Re: autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 03/08/11 22:12, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/03/08 21:31, Nigel Taylor wrote: >> autoconf version should be left at 2.64, 2.65 has never worked for building >> this, or any previous version, should now be 2.67 not available in ports. > > 2.65 requires m4(1) in base to adapt to some other G

autoconf/m4 [was Re: New www/libmicrohttpd]

2011-03-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/03/08 21:31, Nigel Taylor wrote: > autoconf version should be left at 2.64, 2.65 has never worked for building > this, or any previous version, should now be 2.67 not available in ports. 2.65 requires m4(1) in base to adapt to some other GNU m4 features - there are a few small comments in