Re: bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-16 Thread Marc Balmer
* Marc Balmer wrote: > * Okan Demirmen wrote: > > On Sun 2008.07.13 at 09:44 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > I'd be more in favour of removing mini_sendmail and pointing > > > people at femail instead, it's quite a lot more sane... > > > > agreed. can we just do this? objections? > > > > I

Re: bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-15 Thread Marc Balmer
* Okan Demirmen wrote: > On Sun 2008.07.13 at 09:44 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I'd be more in favour of removing mini_sendmail and pointing > > people at femail instead, it's quite a lot more sane... > > agreed. can we just do this? objections? > I object. We still use mini_sendmail.

Re: bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-15 Thread Okan Demirmen
On Sun 2008.07.13 at 09:44 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I'd be more in favour of removing mini_sendmail and pointing > people at femail instead, it's quite a lot more sane... agreed. can we just do this? objections?

Re: bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-13 Thread Henning Brauer
* Jérôme Desquilbet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-13 11:29]: > Sorry for this new message. Maybe not that simple. In my case (DokuWiki in > the regular chrooted Apache), simply replacing mini_sendmail by femail > doesn't work. I'll investigate. femail should handle everything mini_sendmail does,

Re: bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-13 Thread Jérôme Desquilbet
Sorry for this new message. Maybe not that simple. In my case (DokuWiki in the regular chrooted Apache), simply replacing mini_sendmail by femail doesn't work. I'll investigate. Thanks, Jérôme. Jérôme Desquilbet a écrit : OK, why not? Thank you for pointing me to femail, I'll try it instead.

Re: bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-13 Thread Jérôme Desquilbet
OK, why not? Thank you for pointing me to femail, I'll try it instead. I'll let you decide, I am new to OpenBSD, trying to install my first web server. Thanks again, Jérôme. Stuart Henderson a écrit : I'd be more in favour of removing mini_sendmail and pointing people at femail instead, it's

Re: bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
I'd be more in favour of removing mini_sendmail and pointing people at femail instead, it's quite a lot more sane... On 2008/07/13 01:37, Jérôme Desquilbet wrote: > mini_sendmail-chroot-1.3.6p0 static mini_sendmail for chrooted apache > > has a problem: it doesn't handle well To: adresses with na

bug in mini_sendmail

2008-07-12 Thread Jérôme Desquilbet
mini_sendmail-chroot-1.3.6p0 static mini_sendmail for chrooted apache has a problem: it doesn't handle well To: adresses with names, like Firstname Lastname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For example, the following test works: mini_sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -t -v To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test ^D b