Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2

2011-03-21 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Thanks guys, and I am on amd64 as you guessed correctly. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/03/21 07:48, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have >> to wait for upgraded packages. > > i386 packages are likely to b

Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2

2011-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/03/21 07:48, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have > to wait for upgraded packages. i386 packages are likely to be new enough already; new amd64 packages are on the way out now.

Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2

2011-03-21 Thread Brad
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, 08:48:19 EDT, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have > to wait for upgraded packages. I know you guys doing a lot of upgrades > and testing various things out (groff, rc_scripts, wprintf's etc). > Hope it comes out this wee

Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2

2011-03-21 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have to wait for upgraded packages. I know you guys doing a lot of upgrades and testing various things out (groff, rc_scripts, wprintf's etc). Hope it comes out this week. Thanks On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:

Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2

2011-03-21 Thread roberth
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:58:35 +0100 Landry Breuil wrote: > Oh, btw there's been rc1, and here's rc2. Works fine for me on amd64. Been running rc2 since yesterday and rc1 before that.

call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2

2011-03-21 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 02:51:24PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:15:26PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:57:53PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:47:26AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 06: