Never mind.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=12754
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Bryan Vyhmeister
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Brandon Mercer
> wrote:
>> Have you guys also seen chrome take forever or just not resolve stuff?
>
> I am having this exact issue runn
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Brandon Mercer
wrote:
> Have you guys also seen chrome take forever or just not resolve stuff?
I am having this exact issue running the latest chromium pkg on i386
-current from May 27. Was there any resolution to this?
Bryan
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:10 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:07:41PM -0700, Peter Valchev said that
>> After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
>> huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
>> page), I have an update
hmm, on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:07:41PM -0700, Peter Valchev said that
> After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
> huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
> page), I have an update to chromium-5.0.539.0
thanks for the pacakge/port.
2 issue
>>
>> Well it's instant on my desktop machine.
>> Will fidle with it a bit.
>
> Eeepcs usually have a slow ssd for user files (depending on how you
> configured the partitions). It may be that chrome is touching/reading
> a lot of stuff to load the options pane.
>
> But I haven't looked into it so
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Auclair Vincent
wrote:
>>> Tested on an i386 eeepc.
>>> Works fine, some quirks when moving a tab : a square that is not drawn
>>> back until I drop the tab. (it follows the cursor)
>>
>> Hmm, actually tab dragging is totally busted with fvwm2, I just
>> noticed -
2010/4/1 Auclair Vincent :
>>> Tested on an i386 eeepc.
>>> Works fine, some quirks when moving a tab : a square that is not drawn
>>> back until I drop the tab. (it follows the cursor)
>>
>> Hmm, actually tab dragging is totally busted with fvwm2, I just
>> noticed - it always pops it out. So I im
>> Tested on an i386 eeepc.
>> Works fine, some quirks when moving a tab : a square that is not drawn
>> back until I drop the tab. (it follows the cursor)
>
> Hmm, actually tab dragging is totally busted with fvwm2, I just
> noticed - it always pops it out. So I imagine this is window manager
> sp
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Auclair Vincent
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter Valchev wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
>>>
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Peter Valchev wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
>>
>>> After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
>>> huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (lin
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
>
>> After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
>> huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
>> page), I have an update to chromium-5.0.539.0
>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Antti Harri wrote:
> Great to have an updated build, but I guess this is still
> true:
>
> "This package currently requires a CPU supporting SSE2.
> You can check this with: dmesg | grep 'cpu.*SSE2'"
Yeah. I'm sure it's possible to get it working on non-sse2, ther
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Peter Valchev wrote:
> After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
> huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
> page), I have an update to chromium-5.0.539.0
>
> 4.7ish packages for i386 & amd64 are available here:
> http:/
Hi!
Great to have an updated build, but I guess this is still
true:
"This package currently requires a CPU supporting SSE2.
You can check this with: dmesg | grep 'cpu.*SSE2'"
The i386 binary pkg installs and runs fine on my laptop.
--
Antti Harri
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:16 PM, joshua stein wrote:
>> I'd appreciate tests on amd64, especially, as I don't have one locally
>> - I tested that it starts up and renders google.com, but anything more
>> is too much of a pain over ssh X forwarding :-) I know the old port
>> had V8 issues on amd64,
> I'd appreciate tests on amd64, especially, as I don't have one locally
> - I tested that it starts up and renders google.com, but anything more
> is too much of a pain over ssh X forwarding :-) I know the old port
> had V8 issues on amd64, so curious if this works better.
binary package working
After a long battle with various issues that cropped up, and thanks to
huge help from the guy working on the FreeBSD port (linked from my
page), I have an update to chromium-5.0.539.0
4.7ish packages for i386 & amd64 are available here:
http://sightly.net/peter/openbsd/chromium/
As well as the po
17 matches
Mail list logo
