Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-26 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Thu, Mar 26 2020, Marc Espie wrote: [...] > Good enough for me, go for it. Yep. Thanks a lot for improving those items! ok jca@ > There will probably be minor tweaks after the fact by our native speaker. :) We need more of those. 8) -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-26 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:34:24AM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > Attached the 3 modified diffs again, and some comments inline. > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > > > Index: bsd.port.mk.5 > > > === > > > RCS

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-26 Thread Paco Esteban
Attached the 3 modified diffs again, and some comments inline. On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > Index: bsd.port.mk.5 > > === > > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v > > retrieving revision 1

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Wed, Mar 25 2020, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: >> > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets >> > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies >>

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-25 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:11:14PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > > > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets > > > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should cha

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-25 Thread Paco Esteban
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets > > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies > > declarations from foo/bar>=1.1 to foo/bar>=1.1

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-15 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies > declarations from foo/bar>=1.1 to foo/bar>=1.1v0 ?? Yes, that's the main reason that led to i

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-15 Thread Paco Esteban
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Index: bsd.port.mk.5 > > === > > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v > > retrieving revision 1.527 > > diff -u -p -r1.527 bsd.port.mk.5 > > --- bsd.port.mk.5 6 Mar

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/03/14 17:09, Paco Esteban wrote: > Hi ports@, > > Find attached 3 diffs for bsd.ports.mk(5), packages-specs(7) and > www/faq/ports/guide.html > > This comes from a question I asked yesterday about REVISION and EPOCH > which naddy@ tried to explain to me. > > I think this explanation was

clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-14 Thread Paco Esteban
Hi ports@, Find attached 3 diffs for bsd.ports.mk(5), packages-specs(7) and www/faq/ports/guide.html This comes from a question I asked yesterday about REVISION and EPOCH which naddy@ tried to explain to me. I think this explanation was really clear and simple and I have been encouraged to add i