Ian Darwin wrote:
The sysutils/zap port which I nominally maintain has been obsoleted by
pkill which is in the base system. I therefore propose to remove this port.
Should I leave behind (for a while) a minimal Makefile with s/t like
BROKEN= "obsoleted by pkill(1), in base system"
Or is it
Hello!
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 08:21:29PM -0400, Ian Darwin wrote:
>Hannah Schroeter and tedu both spoke up in favor of keeping it,
>so I'll leave it be.
Many thanks.
>Ian
Kind regards,
Hannah.
Hannah Schroeter and tedu both spoke up in favor of keeping it,
so I'll leave it be.
Ian
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:10:35AM -0400, Ian Darwin wrote:
> >The sysutils/zap port which I nominally maintain has been obsoleted by
> >pkill which is in the base system. I therefore propose to remove this port.
>
> I don't think pkill is really eq
Hello!
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:10:35AM -0400, Ian Darwin wrote:
>The sysutils/zap port which I nominally maintain has been obsoleted by
>pkill which is in the base system. I therefore propose to remove this port.
>Should I leave behind (for a while) a minimal Makefile with s/t like
>BROKEN=
The sysutils/zap port which I nominally maintain has been obsoleted by
pkill which is in the base system. I therefore propose to remove this port.
Should I leave behind (for a while) a minimal Makefile with s/t like
BROKEN= "obsoleted by pkill(1), in base system"
Or is it better just to get
