On 03/23/12 14:37, Marc Espie wrote:
Since we are talking about a cluster here, it's likely you're mixingmatching
stuff and confusing what happens on the local box and on the distant box.
I'm pretty sure that, if you take the time to REALLY look at what's going
on on your machine(s), you'll
Catching up on misc@... Inline reply.
On 03/23/12 15:48, Jan Stary wrote:
On Mar 23 13:58:08, RD Thrush wrote:
On 03/23/12 07:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/03/23 07:11, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs directory on
/usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the new test in bsd.port.mk.
Apparently test -h considers an nfs mount the same as a symlink...
The attached diff fixes the problem for me.
Index: bsd.port.mk
On 2012/03/23 07:11, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in bsd.port.mk.
Apparently test -h considers an nfs mount the same as a symlink...
Hmm, that's weird. It doesn't
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:25:49AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/03/23 07:11, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in bsd.port.mk.
Apparently test -h
On Mar 23 07:11:45, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in bsd.port.mk.
Can you please show how exactly you are mounting it,
and how exactly it fails?
If you 'mount
On 03/23/12 08:05, Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:25:49AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/03/23 07:11, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in
On 03/23/12 07:25, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/03/23 07:11, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in bsd.port.mk.
Apparently test -h considers an nfs mount the same as a
On 03/23/12 09:01, Jan Stary wrote:
On Mar 23 07:11:45, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in bsd.port.mk.
Can you please show how exactly you are mounting it,
and how
Since we are talking about a cluster here, it's likely you're mixingmatching
stuff and confusing what happens on the local box and on the distant box.
I'm pretty sure that, if you take the time to REALLY look at what's going
on on your machine(s), you'll figure it out.
I'm convinced that there's
On Mar 23 13:59:42, RD Thrush wrote:
On 03/23/12 09:01, Jan Stary wrote:
On Mar 23 07:11:45, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in bsd.port.mk.
Can you please show how
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Mar 23 07:11:45, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in bsd.port.mk.
Can you please show how exactly you
On 03/23/12 15:50, Jan Stary wrote:
On Mar 23 13:59:42, RD Thrush wrote:
On 03/23/12 09:01, Jan Stary wrote:
On Mar 23 07:11:45, RD Thrush wrote:
My PORTSDIR is on an nfs server. Mounting the particular nfs
directory on /usr/ports (and setting PORTSDIR accordingly) fails the
new test in
13 matches
Mail list logo
