Re: fcitx-pinyin should be automatically replaced by fcitx-chinese-addons

2022-06-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
thanks, committed with REVISION bump. (I also checked that the version number was higher; pkg_add still compares versions when packages are redirected via $stem_extensions) On 2022/06/01 04:09, Yifei Zhan wrote: > Currently pkg_add -u doesn't touch fcitx-pinyin and there is no prompt > reminding

Re: fcitx-pinyin should be automatically replaced by fcitx-chinese-addons

2022-06-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
It's not possible to replace with two packages via quirks. There is another way via a meta package but it's messy. Can we assume that a user who previously had fcitx-table installed and needs the parts which were split into fcitx-chinese-addons also would have had fcitx-pinyin? If so, we can r

Re: fcitx-pinyin should be automatically replaced by fcitx-chinese-addons

2022-06-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
Perhaps it makes sense to add RUN_DEPENDS=inputmethods/fcitx-table-extra to fcitx-chinese-addons? -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 2 June 2022 07:57:12 Yifei Zhan wrote: On 22/06/02 07:20AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: It's not possible to replace with two packages via q

Re: fcitx-pinyin should be automatically replaced by fcitx-chinese-addons

2022-06-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/06/02 08:13, Yifei Zhan wrote: > On 22/06/02 08:03AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Perhaps it makes sense to add RUN_DEPENDS=inputmethods/fcitx-table-extra to > > fcitx-chinese-addons? > > > > I don't really like this idea because then everyone who uses > fcitx-chinese-addons will also ha

Re: fcitx-pinyin should be automatically replaced by fcitx-chinese-addons

2022-06-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/06/03 03:02, Yifei Zhan wrote: > How about this? feel free to tweak/reword it :) Thanks, committed as-is.