On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Coppa wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>> So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine conform to W^X a few
>> months ago. It took a bit longer than expected, but I had a mostly working
>> patch. Then I disappeared from OpenBSD
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, David Coppa wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Landry Breuil wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:28:45PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> > >
> > > So, the only downside seems to be performance related.
> > >
> > > See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215479
> > >
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:28:45PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> >
> > So, the only downside seems to be performance related.
> >
> > See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215479
> >
> > < > it's not
> > enabled elsewhere because it's a per
On 2015/10/16 14:28, David Coppa wrote:
> So, the only downside seems to be performance related.
>
> See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215479
>
> < not
> enabled elsewhere because it's a performance hit (we should remeasure how much
> though). This is because we have to toggle pa
> So, the only downside seems to be performance related.
>
> See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215479
>
> < not
> enabled elsewhere because it's a performance hit (we should remeasure how much
> though). This is because we have to toggle pages from executable to writable
> and ba
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:57:40AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:43:53AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
>> > On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> >
>> > > So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:02:07PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:43:53AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> >> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >>
> >> > So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine c
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:57:40AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:43:53AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> > > So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine conform to W^X a
> > > few
> > > months ago. It took a bit l
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:43:53AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Ted Unangst wrote:
>>
>> > So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine conform to W^X a
>> > few
>> > months ago. It took a bit longer than ex
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:43:53AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine conform to W^X a
> > few
> > months ago. It took a bit longer than expected, but I had a mostly working
> > patch. Then I disappear
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015, Ted Unangst wrote:
> So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine conform to W^X a few
> months ago. It took a bit longer than expected, but I had a mostly working
> patch. Then I disappeared from OpenBSD for a bit and took my patch with me.
> Last week I was just
So I was supposed to be working on making the JIT engine conform to W^X a few
months ago. It took a bit longer than expected, but I had a mostly working
patch. Then I disappeared from OpenBSD for a bit and took my patch with me.
Last week I was just starting to feed that patch upstream to firefox,
12 matches
Mail list logo
