On Sun, Aug 26 2018, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:07:36PM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
>> On Sunday 26 August 2018 12:52:52 Theo Buehler wrote:
>> > A simple one:
>>
>> This doesn't look right - the entire OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 1.1.0 path (on
>> line 40 of
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:07:36PM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Sunday 26 August 2018 12:52:52 Theo Buehler wrote:
> > A simple one:
>
> This doesn't look right - the entire OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 1.1.0 path (on
> line 40 of include/libssl_compat.h) should no longer be taken (or
>
On Sunday 26 August 2018 12:52:52 Theo Buehler wrote:
> A simple one:
This doesn't look right - the entire OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 1.1.0 path (on
line 40 of include/libssl_compat.h) should no longer be taken (or
substantially reduced).
> Index: patches/patch-include_libssl_compat_h
>
A simple one:
Index: patches/patch-include_libssl_compat_h
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/ports/net/ntp/patches/patch-include_libssl_compat_h,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 patch-include_libssl_compat_h
---