Re: follow standard or ports building guidelines?

2007-07-15 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, On Friday 13 of July 2007 15:34:52 Stuart Henderson wrote: > > if I understand the porting guidelines correctly > > everything there should end up below /usr/local/lib/ocf. > > Ports install under ${PREFIX} (normally /usr/local but can be > varied by the admin). See hier(7): /usr/lib is just f

Re: follow standard or ports building guidelines?

2007-07-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
> if I understand the porting guidelines correctly > everything there should end up below /usr/local/lib/ocf. Ports install under ${PREFIX} (normally /usr/local but can be varied by the admin). See hier(7): /usr/lib is just for *system* libraries. Ports with files (e.g. sample configs) installed

Re: follow standard or ports building guidelines?

2007-07-13 Thread Will Maier
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > while trying to port linux-ha heartbeat to OpenBSD, I ran into a > small "dilemma". The Open Cluster Framework says the resources > have to be below /usr/lib/ocf, but if I understand the porting > guidelines correctly everythin

follow standard or ports building guidelines?

2007-07-13 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, while trying to port linux-ha heartbeat to OpenBSD, I ran into a small "dilemma". The Open Cluster Framework says the resources have to be below /usr/lib/ocf, but if I understand the porting guidelines correctly everything there should end up below /usr/local/lib/ocf. what is the preferred