gcc/4.7

2013-06-18 Thread Marc Espie
there's talk about killing that port, as it serves no useful purpose, doesn't provide more arches than 4.8, isn't more functional than 4.8, and uses resources (brain-power to keep it alive and cpu time to build somewhat useless packages). It's not even useful for ada-boostrap, as the path can go

Re: gcc/4.7

2013-06-18 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:39:14PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: there's talk about killing that port, as it serves no useful purpose, doesn't provide more arches than 4.8, isn't more functional than 4.8, and uses resources (brain-power to keep it alive and cpu time to build somewhat useless