On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:33:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/05/23 12:16, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
> > > recently, but we are seeing some por
On 2015/05/23 12:16, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
> > recently, but we are seeing some ports picking up libatomic.so from
> > gcc-4.8 on i386.
> >
> > As this is t
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
> recently, but we are seeing some ports picking up libatomic.so from
> gcc-4.8 on i386.
>
> As this is typically not listed in WANTLIB (only present in x11/ogre)
Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
recently, but we are seeing some ports picking up libatomic.so from
gcc-4.8 on i386.
As this is typically not listed in WANTLIB (only present in x11/ogre)
build often fails, and of course there will be runtime problems for
users w
