Hi,
I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
iDRAC (OK, it was on Fedora). But there's a bugzilla[1] ticket
which mentioned new srpm[2] containing a patch which is neither in
official 1.3 upstream version nor normal 1.3 Fedora rpms.
Anyway, using 1.3 with this patch makes iDRAC wor
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
> iDRAC (OK, it was on Fedora). But there's a bugzilla[1] ticket
> which mentioned new srpm[2] containing a patch which is neither in
> official 1.3 upstream version nor normal 1.3 Fedo
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:45AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
> > iDRAC (OK, it was on Fedora). But there's a bugzilla[1] ticket
> > which mentioned new srpm[2] containing a patc
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:45AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jiri B wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
>> > iDRAC (OK, it was on Fedora). But there's a bugzilla[1] t
On 11/07/12 12:10, David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jiri B wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:45AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jiri B wrote:
Hi,
I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
iDRAC (OK, it w
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:06:15PM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 11/07/12 12:10, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:45AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:10:17PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> >> > I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
> >> > iDRAC (OK, it was on Fedora). But there's a bugzilla[1] ticket
> >> > which mentioned new srpm[2] containing a patch which is neither in
> >> > official 1.3 upstream ve
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:06:15PM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 11/07/12 12:10, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:45AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:33:03AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:10:17PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> > >> > I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
> > >> > iDRAC (OK, it was on Fedora). But there's a bugzilla[1] ticket
> > >> > which mentioned new srpm[2] contai
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:10:17PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
>> >> > I just discovered that icedtea-web 1.3 didn't work with
>> >> > iDRAC (OK, it was on Fedora). But there's a bugzilla[1] ticket
>> >> > which mentioned new srpm[2] containing a patch
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:04:32PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> > javaws is looking for libjava.so in /usr/local/lib/amd64 instead
> > of /usr/local/jdk-1.7.0/jre/lib/amd64, but workaround with symlink
> > works fine.
> >
> > Could anybody check this crap in icedtea-web source?
> >
> > 27677 java
On 11/08/12 16:34, Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:06:15PM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> On 11/07/12 12:10, David Coppa wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jiri B wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:45AM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, J
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:04:32PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
>> > javaws is looking for libjava.so in /usr/local/lib/amd64 instead
>> > of /usr/local/jdk-1.7.0/jre/lib/amd64, but workaround with symlink
>> > works fine.
>> >
>> > Could anybody check
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:03:24PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:04:32PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> >> > javaws is looking for libjava.so in /usr/local/lib/amd64 instead
> >> > of /usr/local/jdk-1.7.0/jre/lib/amd64, but wo
On 11/09/12 15:11, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Nice find! Unless anyone beats me to it, i'll wrap a patch for the port
> including all the fixes, including the redhat fix.
> Giovanni, can you retry logmein with david's and redhat fix ?
Nothing has changed
> And is it
> a regression from 1.2 ?
>
Yes, ic
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:11:29AM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> is icedtea-web a java implementation that you can use with firefox or chrome?
>From icedtea-web page:
"The plugin can be used by yourself in firefox, chrome and chromium by
creating a symlink to it under a mozilla plugins director
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:11:22PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
>> Nice find! Unless anyone beats me to it, i'll wrap a patch for the port
>> including all the fixes, including the redhat fix.
>> Giovanni, can you retry logmein with david's and redha
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 08:12:24PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Jiri B wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:11:22PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> >> Nice find! Unless anyone beats me to it, i'll wrap a patch for the port
> >> including all the fixes, including the
Dell iDRAC works OK with 1.3.1 version.
jirib
19 matches
Mail list logo
