> Also delete BROKEN-sparc64, but I don't have a sparc64. I suspect
> that (yy_size_t *)&result was not a multiple of 8 and raised a SIGBUS
> for misalignment on sparc64, but I don't know.
It did. I tried a while back and ended up using bc-gh in libcrypto
regress because it works on all architect
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 08:36:08 -0400
"Ivan \"Rambius\" Ivanov" wrote:
> Ok from me.
I committed the patch.
My subject was wrong; port is math/gbc, not lang/gbc.
Ok from me.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, 7:04 PM George Koehler wrote:
> Here's a diff to fix GNU bc 1.07.1 in OpenBSD ports.
>
> Wrong code in bc/scan.c was using (yy_size_t *)&result to write to an
> int. This was an overflow on LP64_ARCHS, by writing 8 bytes to a
> 4-byte int. The problem was more
Here's a diff to fix GNU bc 1.07.1 in OpenBSD ports.
Wrong code in bc/scan.c was using (yy_size_t *)&result to write to an
int. This was an overflow on LP64_ARCHS, by writing 8 bytes to a
4-byte int. The problem was more obvious when big-endian.
If we would read 51 bytes,
- a little-endian amd
