* Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:19:44AM CET:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:15:09AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| 1) Move all paths to uninstalled libraries (in the correct order) before
the patch does put them in the order they are encountered. my
Hi Jacob,
* Jacob Meuser wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:03:56AM CET:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:06:09AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Libtool knows that the library is uninstalled, because this information
is encoded in libbar.la
yes, it winds up in $notinst_path. I disconvered that
[ Cc: to libtool mailing list. This thread is at
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.ports/14993
and the interesting bit starts at the end of this post:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.ports/15121 ]
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:06:09AM CET:
* Jacob
Hi Jacob,
* Jacob Meuser wrote on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:42:07AM CET:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:04:07PM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Marc Espie espie at nerim.net writes:
I'm very annoyed at
libtool --mode=link cc -L/usr/local/lib -o foo foo.o ./libbar.la
expanding into some
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 04:25:27PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
patch below seems to do the trick. tested with devel/glib2 and
with this change to glib2. sorry, should have mentioned this before.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
As far as OpenBSD goes, we solve the `various versions' issue differently.
- we have kept the version numbers from old a.out. Our ELF ld.so knows
about libfoo.so.major.minor.
- if we want several versions installed, it's just a question of having
them in distinct directories. ld stops at the
Marc Espie espie at nerim.net writes:
As far as OpenBSD goes, we solve the `various versions' issue differently.
- we have kept the version numbers from old a.out. Our ELF ld.so knows
about libfoo.so.major.minor.
I have a hard time to learn this from the manpages, by the way.
- if we
Sorry for the delay.
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:25:19AM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:10:33PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Brad wrote:
So whatever the library name is supposed to
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:58:44AM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
thanks for responding. it's good to have a libtool developer in
this discussion :)
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:25:19AM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:10:33PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 08:01:11PM -0800, Marc Matteo wrote:
On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Could you point me to discussion about this
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while working on an update for multimedia/mjpegtools, and adding
USE_LIBTOOL=Yes, I would get libraries where lib/libfoo.so.4.0 would
be a symlink to lib/libfoo-1.8.so.4.0, the real library.
Isn't this simply a mistake in the way libtool is called? The
Hi Jacob,
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:50:56AM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
the following patch for the libtool port changes library_names_spec
to just '${libname}${shared_ext}$versuffix'.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 08:12:53PM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Jacob,
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:50:56AM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
the following patch for the libtool port changes
On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Could you point me to discussion about this decision (so I don't write
about stuff already beaten to death here)?
In OpenBSD (at least) the library name that matters is the stuff
between the lib and the .so so libfoo.so.4.0 and
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
while working on an update for multimedia/mjpegtools, and adding
USE_LIBTOOL=Yes, I would get libraries where lib/libfoo.so.4.0 would
be a symlink to lib/libfoo-1.8.so.4.0, the real library.
the following patch for the libtool port changes
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:50:56AM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes:
while working on an update for multimedia/mjpegtools, and adding
USE_LIBTOOL=Yes, I would get libraries where lib/libfoo.so.4.0 would
be a symlink to lib/libfoo-1.8.so.4.0, the
16 matches
Mail list logo
