Joerg Jung wrote:
> > Our port is probably still vulnerable to CVE-2006-0709:
> >
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2006-0709
> >
> > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0217.html
> >
> > There are two patches included in the Debian tickets and I can't tell
> > which was ap
> Am 18.03.2016 um 18:26 schrieb Michael McConville :
>
> Our port is probably still vulnerable to CVE-2006-0709:
>
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2006-0709
>
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0217.html
>
> There are two patches included in the Debian tickets and I c
Our port is probably still vulnerable to CVE-2006-0709:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2006-0709
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0217.html
There are two patches included in the Debian tickets and I can't tell
which was applied. They removed the port in 2009, so it's hard