On 2007/09/14 16:49, L. V. Lammert wrote:
Posted to ports-bugs, .. but nobody caught it.
TBH, I never noticed that list before. Most ports discussion is
on ports@ (cc'd and reply-to set) or with the relevant maintainer
(see the output from 'pkg_info packagename').
Has anyone else noticed the
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/14 16:49, L. V. Lammert wrote:
Posted to ports-bugs, .. but nobody caught it.
TBH, I never noticed that list before. Most ports discussion is
on ports@ (cc'd and reply-to set) or with the relevant maintainer
(see the output from
