New diff
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/ports/net/scapy/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 Makefile
--- Makefile30 Aug 2010 21:21:54 - 1.12
+++ Makefile5 Oct 2010 08:20:42 -
@@
Hi thanks,
Based on your work :
- Update my email address
- Update scapy to the last version (2.1.0)
- Integrate the 2 diffs you sent and remove the comment about the need
to increase the number bpf in the Makefile
Regress tests : PASSED=753 FAILED=3
Full
Thanks all for your quick replies
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:23:37PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:25:39PM +0200, Jonathan Armani wrote:
Yes you need to create a lot of bpf to get a fully functionnal scapy.
Attached is a diff that make bpf device clonable if you want
Hello :)
When I send packets with scapy from packages or lastest mercurial, on OpenBSD
-current, I quickly end up with all my /dev/bpf devices used.
I tried to find the problem in the scapy source without success. Also
searched for the problem in scapy ml, but it seems that scapy v2 works
for
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:42:39 +0200
Laurent Ghigonis laur...@gouloum.fr wrote:
Hello :)
Hi,
Yes you need to create a lot of bpf to get a fully functionnal scapy.
Attached is a diff that make bpf device clonable if you want to give
it a try (Apply it on a -current src).
N'hesite pas à repondre
On 2010/09/30 20:25, Jonathan Armani wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:42:39 +0200
Laurent Ghigonis laur...@gouloum.fr wrote:
Hello :)
Hi,
Yes you need to create a lot of bpf to get a fully functionnal scapy.
Attached is a diff that make bpf device clonable if you want to give
it a try
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:25:39PM +0200, Jonathan Armani wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:42:39 +0200
Laurent Ghigonis laur...@gouloum.fr wrote:
Hello :)
Hi,
Yes you need to create a lot of bpf to get a fully functionnal scapy.
Attached is a diff that make bpf device clonable if you
